February 28th, 2012
Next week the Intergroup will co-host a seminar on the Rights and Citizenship Programme recently proposed by the European Commission. This is the ‘equality chapter’ of the European Union’s 7-year budget, the Multiannual Financial Framework.
In November 2011, the European Commission made a proposal for a ‘Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Rights and Citizenship Programme’. This programme will set out how EU funding is spent for equality and non-discrimination in the period 2014-2020.
All five intergroups working on equality (LGBT; Anti-Racism and Discrimination; Ageing and Intergenerational Solidarity; Disability; and Youth) will host a two-hour discussion on the Commission’s proposal, including reactions by the Danish Presidency of the Council and a range of non-governmental organisations.
This event is free and open to the public. Should you wish to attend at the European Parliament in Brussels, please register online before Friday 2 March at noon.
Tags: anti-discrimination, funding
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
December 12th, 2011
On 8 December 2011, the Intergroup on LGBT Rights held a public roundtable Horizon 2014: What LGBT Rights in the World? The event was attended by Members of the European Parliament, staff from the Parliament and Commission, as well as civil society. A panel of three speakers examined what the EU had accomplished so far for LGBT rights, and what could be expected by the end of the current European mandate in 2014.
Following a short introduction by the Chair, three panelists were invited to give their views on LGBT rights in the EU for the next two and a half years.
Matteo Bonini-Baraldi outlined the work already undertaken by the Fundamental Rights Agency on LGBT rights. After outlining the uneven European landscape for LGBT people’s fundamental rights, Mr Bonini-Baraldi pointed to two upcoming projects of the Agency: an EU-wide survey in 2012, and the publication of key indicators by 2013.
Download his PowerPoint presentation
After remarking that now was certainly the right time to reflect on LGBT rights in the EU, Emmanuel Crabit pointed to three key areas for the progress of LGBT rights in the EU. First, he highlighted the need to make existing EU rights effective on the ground, notably through the European Commission’s strategy “to ensure respect for EU Charter of Fundamental Rights”.
Second, Mr Crabit said work needed to be completed under current proposals, notably the proposed EU-wide anti-discrimination Directive, and in the area of free movement for civil status documents.
Finally, he stressed that EU institutions needed to find out more about fundamental rights ‘on the ground’ in the 27 Member States.
After introducing ILGA-Europe‘s 2009 Be Bothered! Pledge, Silvan Agius presented seven items that should be included in a potential comprehensive approach of the EU to LGBT rights. Notably, he insisted the EU must go beyond a “piecemeal approach” to the rights of LGBT people.
Download his PowerPoint presentation
View the questions and answers between audience and panel (first round):
Second round of questions and answers:
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
November 29th, 2011
On Thursday 8th December, we will hold a public roundtable on LGBT rights in the EU between now and 2014. If you are in Brussels, you are welcome to attend the discussion. Please register online by Sunday 4th December.
How are LGBT rights covered by EU laws and policies today? What progress can we achieve by the end of the current EU mandate in 2014? What are the stepping stones on the road to equality for the coming years?
These questions will be answered by a panel of speakers:
The panel will be chaired by Sirpa Pietikäinen MEP, Vice President of the Intergroup on LGBT Rights.
Read more:
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
July 7th, 2011
On 30 June 2011, the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights held a hearing on LGBTI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex) rights in the world. Members of the European Parliament, European Parliament staff, European Commission staff, ambassadors and members of the public heard from human rights defenders, civil society and high-level EU civil servants about the human rights of LGBTI people worldwide.
Andrzej Grzyb MEP, acting Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights opened the event.
Ulrike Lunacek MEP, Co-President of the LGBT Intergroup, presented the hearing and explained why it was necessary to look at the rights of LGBTI people globally, citing work done recently by the European Parliament
Naome Ruzindana from Rwanda presented recent developments for LGBTI people in eastern Africa, and notably Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi (including how these countries influenced each other).
A movie produced by the International AIDS Alliance showcased interviews with Indian activists commenting on the decriminalisation of homosexuality in 2009.
Argentinean activist Mauro Cabral explained the issues brought forward by a growing global movement for the rights of trans(gender) and intersex people, including trans murders and sterilisation.
Riina Kionka is Head of Division for Human Rights Policy Guidelines in the EU’s External Action Service, and outlined positive action by the EU in several domains: in the EU legal and policy framework, the EU’s bilateral relationships, at the United Nations, and at regional and local level.
Responsible for Governance, Democracy, Gender and Human Rights at the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Development and Cooperation, Jean-Louis Ville outlined action and calls for funding at the European Commission that were likely to help LGBTI civil society in the Global South.
Ulrike Lunacek and Michael Cashman MEPs, Co-Presidents of the LGBT Intergroup, rounded up the discussions.
Read more:
Speakers’ organisations:
Tags: acp, burundi, decriminalisation, eeas, european commission, rwanda, toolkit, transgender, uganda
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
June 30th, 2011
Today the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights is hosting a public hearing on LGBTI rights in the world. The event will be broadcast live online, and videos will be made available online later this week.
You can watch the event online from 9am CET the following ways:
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
June 20th, 2011
On Thursday 30 June, the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights will hold a hearing on LGBTI Rights in the World. Speakers will include LGBTI human rights defenders from the Philippines, Argentina and Rwanda, as well as Members of the European Parliament and high-level EU civil servants.
In its current mandate, the European Parliament has increasingly concerned itself with continuous violations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people’s human rights in the world. The Council’s Working Party on Human Rights also adopted a Toolkit to encourage the decriminalisation of homosexuality, combat discrimination, and assist LGBT human rights defenders in third countries.
This hearing will allow Members of the European Parliament, human rights defenders, NGOs and EU civil servants to discuss the state of LGBTI people’s human rights in the world; what the EU already does to promote universal human rights and decriminalise homosexuality worldwide; and how to best work together in the coming years.
Are you in or around Brussels on 30 June? If so, you are welcome to attend. People requiring a badge to access the European Parliament should register online by Monday 27 June 12:00 at the latest.
The hearing will also be broadcast live. A link will be published nearer the date of the event.
Read more:
Tags: acp, decriminalisation, LGBT toolkit
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
May 11th, 2011

Today Members of the European Parliament wrote an urgent open letter to Ugandan parliamentarians, with the clear message: “Do not adopt the Anti-Homosexuality Bill”. Press and activist reports indicate that the Bill may be discussed and voted upon in the coming 24 hours.
MEPs are calling on Ugandan law-makers not to adopt the Anti-Homosexuality Bill, whether or not it includes a death penalty clause. They highlight that the Bill is a way of diverting public attention from serious human rights breaches throughout Uganda, including intimidation and violence towards protesters and the opposition.
You can download the full letter (PDF), or read the text version below.
Update (18:30 CET) Activists and journalists in Kampala reliably report that the Anti-Homosexuality Bill has been adjourned for examination on Friday 13 May. The Associated Press has amended their report accordingly.
Update 2 (13 May) It appears the Anti-Homosexuality Bill has now been definitively shelved, as the current session of the Ugandan Parliament came to an end without examining the text. We congratulate all Ugandan activists and petitioners who made a significant difference, and we stand ready to step up again if the Bill is reintroduced next term.
To: Rt. Hon. Edward Ssekandi Kiwanuka, Speaker of the Ugandan Parliament; 326 Members of the Ugandan Parliament
Honourable Speaker,
Honourable Members of the Parliament of Uganda,
The world has started reacting to the imminent examination of Mr Bahati’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill, and possibly its adoption before the end of this legislature. If the Bill is not voted upon this week, we understand it may be adopted during Parliament’s next session.
We call on you not to adopt this inhumane Bill not as Europeans, not as aid donors, not as a ‘global moral police’, but as fellow law-makers and fellow human beings. We share your values of human dignity, liberty, peace, and freedom from oppression; and the Anti-Homosexuality Bill goes fully against these values.
Concerns were raised that homosexuality is un-African; yet Africa is not united against homosexuality. While revising its Penal Code a year ago, Rwanda refused to criminalise homosexuality, and made a powerful statement at the United Nations in December 2010 against the persecution of all minorities, including lesbians and gays. Is Rwanda un-African? South Africa enshrined non-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation in its constitution, and allows same-sex couples to marry. Is South Africa un-African? Gabon, the Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, the Seychelles, São Tomé e Principe, Mauritius and South Africa recently UN made statements against the criminalisation of homosexuality. Are these countries un-African?
We are acutely aware of other, none the less grave, ongoing human rights violations in Uganda. We have learnt of authorities tear-gassing marchers en masse during the 29 April demonstrations; opposition figures being intimidated, imprisoned, or intentionally blinded in a shocking display of inhumanity by national authorities; and national authorities increasingly oppressing the people of Uganda through physical repression, intimidation, or imprisonment.
We are fully aware that the last-minute examination of this Bill is an excellent way of diverting your attention, and with it the attention of the Ugandan people, from these serious concerns.
Our House, elected by 500 million citizens, has formally called on Uganda not to adopt the Anti-Homosexuality Bill on two occasions . We are determined that the adoption of any legislation further criminalising consensual sex between adults (including the adoption of this Bill, whether in its current or in any modified form) will have a severe negative impact on our bilateral relations, in both its aid and its diplomatic dimensions.
We call on you to refrain from further criminalising homosexuality. The people of Uganda deserve that your attention be fully devoted to more pressing concerns, including corruption-free governance, basic commodity prices brought under control, freedom of speech and assembly, and decent living conditions.
Do not adopt this Bill.
Heidi Hautala MEP
Chair, Subcommittee on Human Rights
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
Michael Cashman MEP
Co-President of the Intergroup on LGBT Rights
Group of the Alliance of Socialists & Democrats
Ulrike Lunacek MEP
Co-President of the Intergroup on LGBT Rights
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
Sirpa Pietikäinen MEP
Vice-President of the Intergroup on LGBT Rights
Group of the European People’s Party
Raül Romeva i Rueda MEP
Vice-President of the Intergroup on LGBT Rights
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
Rui Tavares MEP
Vice-President of the Intergroup on LGBT Rights
Group of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left
Sophie in ‘t Veld MEP
Vice-President of the Intergroup on LGBT Rights
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Cecilia Wikström MEP
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Gianni Vattimo MEP
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Renate Weber MEP
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Sonia Alfano MEP
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Marietje Schaake MEP
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
Tags: decriminalisation, uganda
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
May 9th, 2011
On the occasion of the International Day Against Homophobia (17 May), the European Parliament will host a selection of pictures from the global photo exhibition Walk With Pride from 9 to 12 May 2011. Members of the European Parliament, staff and press will see the exhibition displayed at the seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg.
The exhibition will be formally opened by Jerzy Buzek, President of the European Parliament, on Tuesday 10 May.
These images were taken by award-winning photographer Charles Meacham during the 2010 pride season, and showcase 11 different prides in Europe. The exhibition, a global initiative of the International Day Against Homophobia Committee, reveals the diversity of pride as well as the extent homophobia can manifest itself within societies.
The Walk With Pride exhibition will be shown in over 20 locations around the world in 2011, starting with an opening at the European Parliament from 9 to 12 May.
Vilnius, Lithuania – Young Lithuanians hold up the rainbow flag and display the message “Welcome to gay Vilnius” during the 2010 Baltic Pride, Lithuania’s first ever pride march. Important political manoeuvring took place to prevent the march from taking place, with Members of Parliament and local officials seeking to suspend the authorisation first granted by the Mayor. The Administrative High Court lifted the permit suspension just one day before the march. Around 350 participants took part in the historic event, protected by 800 policemen and women.
Athens, Greece – A woman holds up an Orthodox icon among pride marchers and rainbow flags. Only one single religious protestor showed up at Athens Pride 2010. In all the prides we visited, participants and activists always met counter- protestors with humor. We never once came across an LGBT organization that said people shouldn’t have the right to hold counter-protests.
Vilnius, Lithuania – Two believers watch on as the Baltic Pride unfolds across the Neris River, a wide stream keeping the two groups apart physically and politically. The Baltic Pride was met with strong opposition, and some Church leaders argued it would subvert societal and family values. In the end, it took place peacefully but for Kazimieras Uoka and Petras Gražulis, two Members of Parliament who broke police cordons and threatened marchers in the secured area.
Bucharest, Romania – Reverend Diane Fisher, a pastor in the global Metropolitan Community Church, walks with activists at the Bucharest Gay Fest Pride March. Not all denominations send negative messages to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. For a growing number of Church leaders and believers, religious texts and teachings embrace diversity, regardless of people’s sexual orientation and gender identity.
Vilnius, Lithuania – A neo-Nazi leader shouts menacing slogans in a megaphone next to police cordons at Baltic Pride. Although it is illegal to display a swastika in Lithuania, the police would not take away the group’s flags stating that minor changes made it legal.
Zagreb, Croatia – Young protestors give the Nazi salute or otherwise express their discontentment as the pride passes. Some violent protestors were arrested during the pride, and several participants were physically assaulted after the event. However, when news channels showed a police officer kicking one of the protestors in the head during an arrest, pride organizers showed nothing but concern for the young man.
Bucharest, Romania – A young mother and her baby look on at a rally organized by a group claiming to represent “family values”, the day before the pride. While the pride was not allowed to march down the crowded streets of the city centre, an organization using hate speech around young children was granted permits to demonstrate in the busiest parts of the city.
Bucharest, Romania – A hateful flyer promises LGBT people that they will go to hell. My fiancée and I were handed this flyer by a young boy as we walked back to our hostel from the pride. His parents had given him these flyers, and told him to give them to anyone passing by. Hate groups increasingly invite women, families and children to relay their messages, hoping this will make discrimination look more acceptable and sensible.
Sofia, Bulgaria – A few days before the pride march, two organizers of Sofia Pride (back) debate live with a representative from a “family values” group (front) on public radio. The representative of the anti-gay group made hateful statements on air, including that all homosexuals are prostitutes, sell drugs, and are infected with HIV. Had the pride representatives not been on the radio, these messages would have remained unchallenged.
Zagreb, Croatia – Policemen in riot gear protect pride participants in the Croatian capital. Hundreds of anti-riot police were needed to keep the piece during the 2010 Zagreb Pride. One of the arguments against having prides is that the costs incurred by municipal authorities can be extremely high to ensure marchers’ security. Many times, it is the participants of prides who are blamed for these costs, instead of the violent protest groups that create the need for heightened security.
Istanbul, Turkey – Bilge, a young transgender woman, exhibits bruises from a physical attack shortly before Istanbul Pride. We gave her this photograph so it could be used as evidence in court. When she went to the police stations they laughed at her and refused helping, until a lawyer got involved. It’s important to educate police forces for the protection of LGBT people, and that they are held accountable when not following procedure. Repeated violence against transgender people in Turkey led to organizing Istanbul’s first Trans Pride in 2010.
Minsk, Belarus – Sergey Yenin, a Belarussian activist, stands alone in the office of Gay Belarus. “Here, we hope the police detain us before the homophobes come.” Sergey and a number of other participants were arrested and held for several days under harsh conditions for participating in Slavic Pride. Upon his release he sent me this email:
I was released today in the afternoon. Now I’m kinda safe and sound, but i’m covered with bruises and bleeding deep scratches all over. the policemen used to beat and mock at me. I spent 2 days in an isolator for administrative criminals. I can’t recall this time without tears in my eyes.
Sofia, Bulgaria – Member of the European Parliament Michael Cashman holds a flag of the European Union, while Sofia Pride organizers discuss just before heading to the march. Local authorities and national governments are under more pressure to protect pride participants when public figures, such as Members of the European Parliament, take part. In 2010, Members of the European Parliament attended pride marches and helped ensure heightened security in Poland, Malta, Lithuania, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova and Serbia.
Warsaw, Poland – Russian activist Nikolai Alekseev and German Green MP Volker Beck walk together during the EuroPride 2010 in Warsaw. A member of the Bundestag since 1994, Volker Beck has marched in every Moscow Pride despite being physically assaulted and shortly arrested at the march in 2006. Elected officials taking part in pride marches help to ensure the events receive greater attention from the media and heightened protection by police forces.
Budapest, Hungary – Two friends hold each other in the Kerepesi cemetery, in the outskirts of the Hungarian capital. Every year, a small memorial is held at the grave of Károly Mária Kertbeny, the Hungarian writer who coined the terms ‘homosexual’ and ‘heterosexual’ in 1869. A few months after this image was taken, his grave was vandalized with homophobic inscriptions.
Budapest, Hungary – A large boulevard in the outer limits of Budapest’s city centre, as the pride parade unfolds. Started in 1992, the history of Budapest Pride goes back almost two decades. While it is more common for social acceptance to increase as prides are held for longer, homophobic protestors in Budapest have successfully used violent attacks to decrease Budapest Pride’s visibility. Since the heavy attacks on the pride in 2007 and 2008, the march now takes place on a closed-off and empty street, out of public view. While this does keep participants away from violent protestors, the general public can be unaware that a pride is even happening.
Moscow, Russia – Marie Yefremenkova, co- organizer of Saint Petersburg Pride, gathers strength before heading out to march in Moscow. In 2010 Moscow Pride was banned for the eighth year in a row, but activists staged a spontaneous event which surprised authorities. This required heavy coordination and secretive meetings at undisclosed locations.
London, United Kingdom – Young activists rest in central London after the London Pride took place in the very city centre, a long rainbow flag waiting to be folded on the pavement. There is a stark contrast between this flag left on the ground for half an hour after the pride finished, whilst it got burned in Lithuania, hidden in Russia, confiscated in Belarus and ripped down in Poland for the rights it represents.
Bucharest, Romania – A young woman flies the rainbow flag in front of the Romanian Parliament. This is a freedom she would not have enjoyed just a generation ago. Romanian authorities recently made efforts to safeguard the right to freedom of expression and assembly for LGBT people. A lot of these positive changes were brought about by Romania’s accession to the European Union in 2007.
Moscow, Russia – Activist Nikolai Alekseev sits in the waiting area of a courtroom ahead of a hearing on the ban of Moscow Pride, while the city’s lawyer looks on. Nikolai has lead the fight for LGBT marches in Russia for many years. In October 2010 the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russian authorities had no right to ban the pride march, as it had done for the last 7 years. Russia’s appeal was turned down in April 2011. Following the Strasbourg ruling, Nikolai has applied for authorization to hold a pride march in May 2011, which I plan to again photograph. He says activists plan to march regardless of whether or not city authorities grant the authorization.
Pictures of the inauguration will be posted as soon as they become available.
Tags: european parliament, freedom of assembly, freedom of expression, idaho, pride
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
May 5th, 2011
On Tuesday 3 May, the LGBT Intergroup and the ALDE Group organised a public seminar on the free movement of same-sex families in the EU. Thank you to the 80 participants and the 270 people who watched the event online!
Speakers’ speeches are available in video below, or on this Vimeo page. You can also download speakers’ presentations, where available.
With the first panel, the seminar first discussed to what extent the free movement of same-sex families is a legal competence of the European Union.
Kaisa presented the situation she finds herself in with her same-sex life partner and their two children.
Dr Helen Toner suggested that the ultimate question was where to draw the line between mutual recognition, which is a competence of the EU, and substantive family law, which is a national competence.
Head of Unit for Judicial co-operation in civil matters, Salla Saastamoinen presented the work undertaken by the European Commission in the area of matrimonial property, and upcoming work on the mutual recognition of the effects of civil status documents.
Pál Szirányi reflected on the past adoption of other EU instruments in judicial co-operation for civil matters, and the prospects for current discussions from the perspective of the Council of the European Union.
In this second panel, speakers looked at potential solutions to correct current gaps in European legislation.
Silvan Agius provided a thorough overview of ILGA-Europe’s contribution to the European Commission consultation on mutual recognition of the effects of civil status documents.
Ben Baks presented the Dutch Government’s position, making a strong case for mutual recognition on legal, moral and economic grounds.
Emma Reed also argued in favour of better between EU Member States on behalf of the Government of the United Kingdom.
Finally, Sophie in ‘t Veld concluded by asking why children in the European Union were denied their right to have their existing families recognised. She pledged to keep working on this issue and to ask the European Commission how it will address the current situation.
Tags: european commission, european council, free movement
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off
May 3rd, 2011
Today in Brussels, the ALDE Group and the Intergroup on LGBT Rights are co-hosting a seminar on Free movement of same-sex families in the EU. This is a highly topical issue: what rights do EU citizens lose or retain while moving between Member States? how far can EU and national laws go in protecting citizens’ rights? what do Member States and the Commission have to say on the matter?
This seminar will present the issue in details, provide testimonies of discrimination that have a European dimension, discuss existing European legislation and regulations, and examine existing gaps in the legislation. Speakers and participants include Members of the European Parliament, the European Commission, the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, and non-governmental organisations including ILGA-Europe.
14:00 – 14:15 Introduction
14:15 – 15:15 Freedom of movement for same-sex families and EU competences
Chair: Sophie in ‘t Veld, Member of the European Parliament
15:15 – 16:15 What solutions against discrimination?
Chair: Ulrike Lunacek, Member of the European Parliament
16:15 – 16:30 Concluding remarks
Chair: Sophie in ‘t Veld, Member of the European Parliament
Tags: free movement
Posted in Intergroup documents, Recent news | Comments Off